Legal Opinion
Thomas v. Eugene
New York Supreme Court
Decided August 8, 2013Published
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
David I. Schmidt, J.
Respondent candidate Mathieu Eugene moves for an order: (1) dismissing the petition based on petitioner Saundra Thomas’ failure to state her fraud allegations with particularity in her petition and bill of particulars and, alternatively, (2) striking Thomas’ bill of particulars and precluding petitioner Thomas from presenting proof with respect to the allegations contained *420in the bill of particulars based on Thomas’ failure to verify the bill of particulars.1
The portion of the motion requesting dismissal of the petition is granted and the petition is…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Pludeman v. NORTHERN LEASINGNew York Court of Appeals · 2008
- Polonetsky v. Better Homes Depot, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2001
- High Tides, LLC v. DeMicheleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- MATTER OF LARSEN v. CanaryNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Miller v. Board of AssessorsNew York Court of Appeals · 1997
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.