Legal Opinion · Dissent

Nohrnberg v. Boley

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided June 1, 1925Published

1Dissent

TAYLOR, J.,

Dissenting. — I concur in modifying the judgment to absolve the bank.

I cannot concur in holding that a lien does not exist during the sixty-day period allowed for filing a claim, or that Moorman could not, under the circumstances, to protect his mortgage, pay during that period the amount of valid liens claimed though not filed, and deduct such payments from the proceeds of the sale.

California has, up to the rendering of the opinion in People v. Moxley, 17 Cal. App. 466, 120 Pac. 43, often referred to the right of a lien as an inchoate right, subject to perfection by filing a…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Kipp v. SilvermanMontana Supreme Court · 1901
  2. James Hunter & Co. v. Truckee LodgeNevada Supreme Court · 1879
  3. Glass v. Basin & Bay State Mining Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Johnson v. Wilson & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1902
  5. United States v. LoughreySupreme Court of the United States · 1898

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API