Legal Opinion

Moore v. Doerr

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 29, 1918PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Jackson. Circuit Court. — Hon. William T. Johnson, Special Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtEllison, P. J.

This action is for damages alleged to have resulted to plaintiff from an alleged assault and battery. The judgment in the trial court was for the plaintiff.

When the panel of jurors were being examined on their voir dire plaintiff counsel asked them if they knew “Ed Findley the gambler who is the father of Mrs. Doerr one of the defendants in the case.” They likewise stated to the panel that it would he shown that Mrs. Doerr, since the suit was brought had conveyed a large amount of property “to Mrs Findley the wife of Ed Findley, the gambler.” These questions and statements were improper. They…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Theobald v. St. Louis Transit Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1905
  2. Nichols v. NicholsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1898
  3. Gore v. BrockmanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1909
  4. Taylor v. PullenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1899
  5. Beck v. Quincy, Omaha & Kansas City RailroadMissouri Court of Appeals · 1908

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. McCrory v. Bland.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1946
  2. State v. Lasson.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1922
  3. State v. BurnsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1921
  4. State v. ArchieSupreme Court of Missouri · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API