Legal Opinion

Sutherland v. Pepsi-Cola Bottling Co.

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided May 30, 1979PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DELAHANTY, Justice.

Aggrieved by a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Commission, the employer secured a pro forma decree from the Superior Court, Penobscot County, and now prosecutes this appeal. Since we agree with the employer’s position that the record fails to demonstrate that the employee gave adequate notice of injury as required by 39 M.R.S.A. § 63, we sustain the appeal and remand the case for further proceedings.

FACTS

On January 26, 1977, the employee was working in the employer’s bottling plant in Brewer, Maine, when he bent down to move a beer barrel with one hand and felt an…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Darrah v. FosterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1962
  2. Dufault v. Midland-Ross of Canada, Ltd.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1977
  3. Batchelder v. TweedieSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1972
  4. Central Maine Power Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1954
  5. Bill Rapp Turner v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Dunton v. Eastern Fine Paper CompanySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1980
  2. Riley v. Bath Iron Works Corp.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1994
  3. Dobson v. Quinn Freight Lines, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1980
  4. Lagasse v. Hannaford Bros. Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1985
  5. Gallant v. Boise Cascade Paper GroupSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API