Legal Opinion

Millsaps v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided February 10, 1976No. 7046PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

SCHOTT, Judge.

Plaintiff has appealed from a dismissal of her suit for damages for injuries she sustained in a fall at an A&P Food Store in New Orleans at about one o’clock in the afternoon on October 18, 1973. Defendant is the liability insurer of the store. The trial judge gave the following reasons for judgment:

“The law is clear that a storekeeper is not an insurer of his invitees, and negligence on the part of the storekeeper must be shown in order for plaintiff to recover. The Court is of the opinion that plaintiff in the instant case has failed to prove, by the preponderance of the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kavlich v. KramerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1975
  2. Gonzales v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1976
  3. Gonzales v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1975
  4. Couto v. OmsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1975
  5. Couto v. OmsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1975

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Millsaps v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API