Legal Opinion

Chamberlin v. R. W. Milbank & Co.

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided April 15, 1851PublishedCited by 3 opinions

APPEAL from the Fourth District Court of New Orleans, Strawbridge, J.

1Opinion of the Court

The judgment of the court was pronounced by

Rost, J.

The plaintiff claims from the defendants the delivery of a note of hand, subscribed by one Martam, deposited by him with John D. Marsh, and avers that the order he gave the defendants, R. W. Milbank Sf Co., on Marsh for said note was obtained by fraud and without consideration. The case is before us on the appeal of R. W. Milbank Sf Co.

One Thomas P. Hoey, a stranger in this city, employed the firm of R. W. Milbank Sf Co. as his merchants, and delivered to them a bill of lading for fifty bales of cotton, or thereabouts, upon which they…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Longenbaugh v. Louisiana Irr. & Mill Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1911
  2. Farris v. MillerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1935
  3. Byrd v. J. F. Meeks Lumber Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API