Legal Opinion

Bachman v. Bachman

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 10, 1993No. 91-2915Published

1Per curiam

We reverse that portion of the final judgment of dissolution directing that the marital residence be sold. It is clear from even the limited record before us that there is no evidence or finding supporting that aspect of the final judgment. We remand for the final judgment to be amended to provide that Appellant is to have the use and possession of the home until the minor child of the parties reaches majority or the child is otherwise emancipated. Cruz v. Cruz, 574 So.2d 1117 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990); Kanouse v. Kanouse, 549 So.2d 1035 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989); Neustein v. Neustein, 503 So.2d 439 (Fla.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Canakaris v. CanakarisSupreme Court of Florida · 1980
  2. Applegate v. Barnett Bank of TallahasseeSupreme Court of Florida · 1979
  3. Pino v. PinoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  4. Cruz v. CruzDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API