Ferguson v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the Court
*654memorandum by the court
• The facts of this case fall far short of showing any contract, express or implied, on the part of the Government to pay plaintiffs for the material which they had on hand when their contract was completed. There was no written contract between the parties on this subject, nor did the officers who conferred with plaintiffs about the performance of the purchase order then in process of completion have any authority to make any other contract than the one in hand. They did not assume to make any contract. To entitle a plaintiff to compensation under an agreement it is…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Nixon v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1924
- Neal-Blun Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1924