Legal Opinion

Bank of Westfield v. Inman

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided May 13, 1893No. 855Published

From the Hamilton Circuit Court.

1Opinion

On Petition fob, a Rehearing.

2Per curiam

It is settled by a long line of decisions that a rehearing will not be granted to enable the parties to procure a correction of the record. Warner v. Campbell, 39 Ind. 409; Pittsburgh, etc., R. R. Co. v. Van Houten, 48 Ind. 90; Cole v. Allen, 51 Ind. 122; State, ex rel., v. Terre Haute, etc., R. R. Co., 64 Ind. 297 (303); Board, etc., v. Hall, 70 Ind. 469 (476); Mansur v. Churchman, 84 Ind. 573; Robbins v. Magee, 96 Ind. 174 (179); State v. Dixon, 97 Ind. 125 (126); Board, etc., v. Center Tp., 105 Ind. 422 (444); Elliott’s App. Proced., section 556.

By section 3 of…

3Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Board of Commissioners v. HallIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  2. Board of Commissioners v. Center TownshipIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Robbins v. MageeIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Warner v. CampbellIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
  5. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, & St. Louis Railroad v. Van HoutenIndiana Supreme Court · 1874

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API