Legal Opinion
Montgomery v. Anderson
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided December 4, 2001No. 00-3134PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
After prisoner Jerry Montgomery’s fourth disciplinary infraction in twelve months, an Indiana prison disciplinary board convicted him of being a habitual rule violator. Montgomery moved under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 to vacate this conviction, alleging that, because of a change in the prison disciplinary rules that took effect while his administrative appeals were pending, he no longer qualified as a habitual offender. The district court denied relief, and Montgomery appealed. We appointed counsel to assist Montgomery and asked the parties to brief the effect of the new rule on Montgomery’s…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Village of Willowbrook v. OlechSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Marina Zarnes v. Randall Rhodes, Sergeant 402, Officer of the Sheriff's Department, Don M. Lamb, U.S. Marshal ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- Arlene Otis v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- Ricky Crawford v. Indiana Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Montgomery v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003