Legal Opinion

Fierro v. Gomez

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 21, 1996No. 94-16775PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PREGERSON, Circuit Judge:

Plaintiffs, three California inmates sentenced to death, brought this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The inmates alleged that California’s method of execution, lethal gas, constitutes cruel and unusual punishment and thus violates the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments of the federal Constitution. The United States District Court for the Northern District of California held that, to the extent that the statute provides for execution by lethal gas, it is cruel and unusual punishment. Defendants James Gomez, Director of the California Department of Corrections, and Arthur…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Preiser v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Rhodes v. ChapmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. People v. BradfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Zuliken S. Royce v. John E. Hahn, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
  3. State v. WebbSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
  4. State v. MataNebraska Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Sam Felder, Jr., Also Known as Sammie Felder v. Gary L. Johnson, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional DivisionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API