Legal Opinion

Homewood Peoples Bank v. Cull

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 28, 1925No. Appeal, 43PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Porter, J.,

This is an action of assumpsit to recover of the defendant as surety the amount due upon a Aonnegotiable note. The court below entered judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense and the defendant appeals. The note was made by Nora O’Connor payable to the order of the defendant, who assigned the same, by contract in writing, and did “guarantee payment of same at maturity.” The affidavit of defense did not deny the existence of the full amount of the debt indicated by the note, nor did it aver that any part of said debt had been paid.

The note contained a warrant…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Beaver Trust Co. v. MorganSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
  2. Park Bank v. KlemanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  3. Searight v. Carlisle Deposit BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1894
  4. Mosser v. CriswellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1892
  5. Fifth Avenue Bank v. KlaussSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1899

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. North City Trust Company CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API