Commissioner v. Mahler
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Per curiam
We agree with and shall follow the decisions made on the precise point at issue here by our brethren of the Third, Fourth and Ninth Circuits. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Stockly, 3 Cir., 221 F.2d 745, affirming Stockly v. Commissioner, 22 T.C. 28; Hofferbert v. Marshall, 4 Cir., 200 F.2d 648, affirming Marshall v. Hofferbert, D.C.Md., 108 F.Supp. 350; Ford v. Commissioner, 9 Cir., 217 F.2d 886, adopting the reasoning expressed in the opinion of Judge (now Chief Judge) Murdock in the Stockly case, supra, after review by the entire Tax Court.
Affirmed.
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hofferbert v. Marshall Et UxCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1952
- Stockly v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1954
- George K. Ford and Helen L. Ford v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1954
- Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Ayres J. Stockly and Esther W. StocklyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1955
- Marshall v. HofferbertDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1952
3Cited by1 opinion
- Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Benjamin and Julia F. MahlerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956