State Ex Rel. Holthaus v. Holtcamp
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtDaues, P. J.
This is an original proceeding by prohibition. Our preliminary rule having issued, respondents filed a return in the nature of a demurrer to the petition for the writ, and thus we have the issues made. The situation may be stated, briefly, as follows:
The respondent Holteamp .is Judge of the probate court of the city of St. Louis, Missouri. On February 6, 1925, respondent Elmo Gr. Holthaus filed an information before said probate court alleging that relatrix Fredericka Holthaus was in the city of St. Louis, and by appropriate averments prayed for an inquiry into her sanity, charging that she…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State ex rel. Crouse v. MillsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1910
- State ex rel. Finch v. DuncanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1917
- State ex rel. Johnston v. CaulfieldSupreme Court of Missouri · 1912
3Cited by4 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Terry v. HoltkampSupreme Court of Missouri · 1932
- Winkler v. DuvallMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005
- State Ex Rel. Frank v. PorterfieldMissouri Court of Appeals · 1926
- State Ex Rel. Anderson v. KirklandMissouri Court of Appeals · 1932