Legal Opinion

State v. Jones

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided May 2, 1935Published

1Opinion of the CourtHudson, J.

Report upon agreed statement of facts. In the Municipal Court of Portland, the respondent, a contract carrier as defined in P. L. 1933, Ch. 259, Sec. 5, was found guilty of operation of his 'motor truck without permit as therein required. He appealed to the Superior Court, from which Court this report comes.

It appears that at the time of the alleged violation of the statute, the respondent, resident of Yarmouth, while under contract with the Pejepscot Paper Company of Topsham, had been and was then using his truck for the transportation of coal from Portland to Topsham. “His practice . . .…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Pease v. FoulkesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1929
  2. Casler v. . Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
  3. Van Oss v. Premier Petroleum Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API