Folmar v. Carlisle
Supreme Court of Alabama
Appeal from the Chancery Court of Pike. Heard before the Hon. Jebe N. Williams. The facts of the case are sufficiently stated in the opinion. cited Heflin v. Milton, 69 Ala. 854 ; Sayre v. Westcott, 94 Ala. 476. cited Cordova Goal Co. v. Long, 91 Ala. 538 ; Woodall v. Kelly & Co., 85 Ala. 368 ; Carver v. Eads, 65 Ala. 190 ; Plowman v. McLean, 14 Ala. 169.
1Opinion of the CourtHaralson, J.
The bill is for the .enforcement of a vendor’s lien for the payment of the purchase money for land. The appellee was complainant below, and appellant the defendant. The court overruled the motion of defendant to dismiss the bill for want of equity; and on that ruling the assignment of error is based.
The case made by the bill, so far as a test of its equity goes, lies in the averments, that on the 1st of July, 1895, complainant sold to defendant a certain tract of land, fully described in section one of the bill, lying and being in Pike county, Alabama, for the sum of frwenty*451five hundred…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Heflin v. MiltonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1881
- Oliver v. Ala. Gold Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1886
- Harper v. CampbellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1893
- Reynolds v. KirkSupreme Court of Alabama · 1894
- Whisenant v. GordonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1893
3Cited by1 opinion
- Adams v. FosterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1914