White v. Orlando Utilities Commission
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
ALLEN, Judge.
Appellants, plaintiffs below, appeal a final judgment dismissing their amended complaint. The complaint, after alleging the defendant-appellee’s corporate existence and plaintiff-appellants’ ownership of certain premises, alleged that appellee had undertaken, for consideration, to transmit electric current to appellants’ premises and that appellee was thereby obligated to use proper equipment and observe proper procedures in the transmission of the current.
Continuing, the complaint alleged that appellee failed to meet this obligation in that:
“ * * * defendant’s employee turned on…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Florida Power & Light Co. v. BridgemanSupreme Court of Florida · 1938
- Hughes v. Louisiana Power and Light CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1957
- Bell v. Florida Power & Light Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1958
- Reardon v. Florida West Coast Power Corp.Supreme Court of Florida · 1929
3Cited by7 opinions
- Emile v. Florida Power & Light CompanyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
- Geraldine Kroger, Administratrix of the Estate of James Kroger, Deceased v. Omaha Public Power DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1975
- City of Starkville v. HarrisonMississippi Supreme Court · 1982
- Glazer v. Florida Power & Light Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
- Callejas v. Horsepower Electric, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.