Legal Opinion

Ross v. State Board of Bar Examiners

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided March 4, 1968No. 8523PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

' OPINION

COMPTON, Justice.

The petitioner seeks a review of the decision of the Board of Bar Examiners denying his application for admission to the New Mexico State Bar on motion.

The pertinent provision of Rule 11(A) (10), § 18-1-8, N.M.S.A.1953, Pocket Supp. 1967, reads:

“The board of bar examiners, in exceptional circumstances, may, in its discretion, waive the taking of examination and move the admission on motion of any person regularly admitted to practice law in the highest court of any state or territory who has * * * generally Mm himself out as an attorney and has actively and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Romero v. H. A. Lott, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Rask v. Board of Bar ExaminersNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Application of SedilloNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Warren v. Board of Bar ExaminersNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Lanning v. State Board of Bar ExaminersNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1963

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Harty v. Board of Bar ExaminersNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Lucius v. State Board of Bar ExaminersNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Chapman v. Board of Bar ExaminersNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API