Legal Opinion
Ross v. State Board of Bar Examiners
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided March 4, 1968No. 8523PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
' OPINION
COMPTON, Justice.
The petitioner seeks a review of the decision of the Board of Bar Examiners denying his application for admission to the New Mexico State Bar on motion.
The pertinent provision of Rule 11(A) (10), § 18-1-8, N.M.S.A.1953, Pocket Supp. 1967, reads:
“The board of bar examiners, in exceptional circumstances, may, in its discretion, waive the taking of examination and move the admission on motion of any person regularly admitted to practice law in the highest court of any state or territory who has * * * generally Mm himself out as an attorney and has actively and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Romero v. H. A. Lott, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1962
- Rask v. Board of Bar ExaminersNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
- Application of SedilloNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1959
- Warren v. Board of Bar ExaminersNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
- Lanning v. State Board of Bar ExaminersNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1963
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Harty v. Board of Bar ExaminersNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1970
- Lucius v. State Board of Bar ExaminersNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1972
- Chapman v. Board of Bar ExaminersNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1971