Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Kinney

District Court, S.D. California

Decided March 30, 2022No. 3:20-cv-01354Unknown

1Opinion

. 2 . 4 5 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 |} ANTHONY JOHNSON, Case No.: 20-cv-1354-JO-MSB 12 Plaintitt,| ORDER DENYING MOTION TO 13 || V- DECLARE PLAINTIFF A || DAVID KINNEY, et al., GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS 15 ||. Defendants.| AND DENYING AS MOOT MOTION 16 FOR ENTRY OF PARTIAL JUDGMENT 17 18 19 20 21 Defendant Storix, Inc. filed a motion for an order declaring Plaintiff Anthony 22 || Johnson a vexatious litigant and a motion to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6). Plaintiff filed < 23 |}motion for entry of partial judgment under Rule 54(b), to immediately…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Hebbe v. PlilerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  4. Taylor v. SturgellSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  5. Semtek International Inc. v. Lockheed Martin Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API