Legal Opinion

Weisberg v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided July 22, 1977No. 77-139PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OTT, Judge.

Appellant pled nolo contendere to a charge of possession of more than five grams of marijuana. He specifically reserved his right to appeal the court’s denial of his two motions to suppress evidence. He contends that the affidavit in support of the search warrant was defective. We agree and reverse.

The confidential informant was described in the affidavit as a “reliable and trustworthy confidential informer. . There were no further allegations or facts supporting such a conclusion.

In Davis v. State, 346 So.2d 141 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977), the First District Court of Appeal found an…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. State v. WolffSupreme Court of Florida · 1975
  4. Davis v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977
  5. State v. ComptonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Barfield v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  2. State v. LasswellDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
  3. LaChance v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API