Legal Opinion

Lever Bros. v. Commonwealth

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 6, 1919PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Two petitions, filed in the Supreme Judicial Court respectively on April 10 and 5, 1918, under St. 1909, c. 490, Part III, § 70, to recover the amounts of certain excises and filing fees alleged to have been exacted unlawfully as described in the •opinion.

Read the full summary

Two petitions, filed in the Supreme Judicial Court respectively on April 10 and 5, 1918, under St. 1909, c. 490, Part III, § 70, to recover the amounts of certain excises and filing fees alleged to have been exacted unlawfully as described in the •opinion. In each of the cases the Commonwealth filed a demurrer assigning, in the case of Lever Brothers Company, the following grounds of demurrer: “1. So far as said petition relates to taxes paid by the petitioner on November 14, 1914, November 12, 1915, and January 15, 1917, it is not brought ‘within six months after the payment of the same/ as…

1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C. J.

These are petitions brought by foreign corporations under St. 1909, c. 490, Part III, § 70, to recover corporation excise taxes and filing fees alleged to have been exacted illegally. Each petition was filed in April, 1918. The petition of Lever Brothers Company seeks the recovery of excises and fees paid in 1914,- 1915, 1917 and in February, 1918; that of the Philadelphia and Reading Coal and Iron Company seeks the recovery of excises and fees paid in 1914, 1915, 1916 and in December, 1917. It is an express term of said § 70 that any corporation “aggrieved by the exaction of said tax or…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Southern Pacific Company v. JensenSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. Kawananakoa v. PolyblankSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  3. Mayor of New York v. MilnSupreme Court of the United States · 1837
  4. Wilson v. IsemingerSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  5. Louisiana v. McAdooSupreme Court of the United States · 1914

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. General Outdoor Advertising Co. v. Department of Public WorksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  2. Remington Arms Co. Inc. v. Lechmere Tire & Sales Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1959
  3. Bogigian v. Commissioner of Corporations & TaxationMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
  4. Sloane v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925
  5. Old Dominion Co. v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API