State v. Stroessenreuther
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
DIETZ, Judge.
*772 Defendant Joshua Stroessenreuther appeals from the trial court's order imposing satellite-based monitoring. Relying on the U.S. Supreme Court's recent decision in Grady v. North Carolina , --- U.S. ----, 135 S.Ct. 1368 , 191 L.Ed.2d 459 (2015), which held that satellite-based *773 monitoring implicates the Fourth Amendment, Stroessenreuther argues that our State's satellite-based monitoring laws are facially unconstitutional or, alternatively, unconstitutional as applied to him.
We reject Stroessenreuther's facial challenge. That challenge is premised on the notion that, because the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- City of L. A. v. PatelSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
- Grady v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
- State v. GrahamCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
- State v. BlueCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
- State v. MorrisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. LopezCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2019
- State v. FritscheCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2022
- State v. FritscheCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2022