Legal Opinion

Downing v. Oxweld Acetylene Co.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided December 21, 1933PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Heheb, J.

Respondent sued to recover damages sustained, it is said, as the result of the negligence of appellant, his •employer, in failing to provide him with a reasonably safe place to work. The complaint, stating a cause of action under the common law, charged that respondent, whose work was the repairing and testing of blowpipes, suffered disease as the result of exposure to noxious gases, fumes and other injurious matter. At the trial respondent claimed that his diseased condition was the result of carbon bisulphide and carbon monoxide poisoning.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lipschitz v. New York & New Jersey Produce Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1933
  2. Ducjack v. New Jersey Zinc Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1928
  3. S. Kosson & Sons v. Union Building & Construction Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1930

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Masich v. United States Smelting, Refining & Mining Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Biglioli v. Durotest Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1957
  3. Triff v. National Bronze & Aluminum Foundry Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Covington v. Berkeley Granite Corp.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1936
  5. Estelle v. Bd. of Ed., Red BankNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API