Morrilton Ice & Fuel Co. v. Montgomery
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
-Kirby, J.
This appeal is prosecuted from a decree for the balance of the purchase money due for machinery or apparatus sold to appellants, and foreclosure of ma-terialman’s lien therefor.
Appellees, an Illinois corporation engaged in business in Chicago, upon receipt of a telegram from appellants, stating: “In market for sterilizer. Send representative at once. Wire.” Sent its agent to appellants engaged in the manufacture of ice at Morrilton, and sold them, under the terms of a written contract, “One (1) SEL 3 Hartman electrolytic sterilizer 400/500 G-.P.H. 2020.”
The contract recites the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Mitchell Manufacturing Co. v. KempnerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1907
- Matthews v. Georgia State Savings Ass'nSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1918
- Standard Lumber Co. of Pine Bluff v. WilsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1927
- Texas Company v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1929
- Pfeiffer Stone Co. v. BrogdonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1916
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Lyle v. LatouretteSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1946
- Hanson Motor Co. v. YoungSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1954
- United States Ozone Co. v. Morrilton Ice Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1932
- Rhode v. KremerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1983
- Hanson Motor Co. v. YoungSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1954