Legal Opinion

In re Curran

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 13, 1992Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

Respondent is presently suspended from practice as an attorney and counselor-at-law for prior acts of professional misconduct that involved deceitful and fraudulent representation of two clients (Matter of Curran, 152 AD2d 111). The *64present charges are of a similar nature, but involve a more serious misrepresentation.

We confirm the findings of the Hearing Officer that respondent fraudulently prepared, conformed and certified a copy of purported divorce decree and falsely represented that the original had been signed and entered by Justice John M. Finnerty. Respondent gave…

3Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re CurranAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API