Legal Opinion

Henry v. Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 30, 2008PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The court exercised its discretion in a provident manner in granting the motion to change venue, where defendants made the requisite showing that retention of this action in Bronx County would inconvenience nonparty material witnesses (see Hoogland v Transport Expressway, Inc., 24 AD3d 191 [2005]). Defendants submitted, inter alia, the affidavits of a witness who came upon the accident scene while plaintiffs decedent may still have been alive, of the police officer and EMS worker who responded to the scene and prepared reports detailing their actions at the scene, and of the now-retired…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kennedy v. C.F. Galleria at White PlainsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  2. Hoogland v. Transport Expressway, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Vered v. WittenbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
  2. Dlugaski v. Port AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  3. Dlugaski v. Port AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  4. Walton v. Mercy CollegeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API