Matter of Bd. of Educ. of the Roosevelt Union Free Sch. Dist. v. Roosevelt Teachers Ass'n
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed and the judgment of the Supreme Court denying the application to stay arbitration reinstated. The board’s failure to advance a Serious argument under the Taylor Law (Civil Service Law, art 14) and the grant to the arbitrator of the "authority to decide whether the provisions of this Agreement have been complied with” mandate the conclusion that the arbitrator had jurisdiction to resolve the union’s claim that the so-called "per diem” teachers were "substitute teachers” within the terms of the agreement (see…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- In re the Arbitration between the Acting Superintendent of Schools of Liverpool Central School District v. United Liverpool Faculty Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
- South Colonie Central School District v. LongoNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
3Cited by7 opinions
- In Re the Arbitration Between Board of Education of Watertown City School District & Watertown Education Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1999
- Board of Education v. BarniNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- In the Arbitration between Franklin Central School & Franklin Teachers Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Board of Education v. GlaubmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- In re the Arbitration between Inc. Village of Malverne & Malverne Police Benevolent Ass'nNew York Supreme Court · 1981
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.