Legal Opinion
State v. Armijo
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided September 12, 1995No. 16274PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HARTZ, Judge.
1. Defendant appeals his convictions of felony shoplifting, conspiracy, and concealing identity. The calendar notice proposed summary affirmance. Defendant has timely responded with a memorandum in opposition. We affirm.
2. We need discuss only two of Defendant’s issues. The others are resolved adequately by the discussion of them in the calendar notice, which we adopt but do not include in this published opinion.
3. The first issue we address in this opinion can be resolved summarily. Defendant contends that he cannot be convicted of both shoplifting and conspiracy to…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Pinkerton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- State v. LuceroNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. OchoaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1937
- Neilson v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1979
- State v. WallNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1980
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. CarrascoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. MarquezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2009
- State v. CattNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2018
- State v. CattNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2018
- State v. CarrascoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1997
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.