Legal Opinion
Grasso v. Norton
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided April 30, 1974No. Civ. B-813, B-74-87PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION ON MOTIONS FOR SUPPLEMENTAL-RELIEF
NEWMAN, District Judge.
In these two unrelated cases raising issues concerning the procedures of the United States Board of Parole in the administration of 18 U.S.C. § 4208(a)(2), both sides have filed motions seeking supplemental relief after the initial decisions. Grasso v. Norton, 371 F.Supp. 171 (D.Conn.1974) (hereafter Grasso I); Diaz v. Norton, 376 F.Supp. 112 (D.Conn.1974).
Grasso I ruled that an (a) (2) prisoner, who is eligible for parole at any time, could not receive less effective parole consideration than a non-(a) (2)…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Linkletter v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Chevron Oil Co. v. HusonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Cipriano v. City of HoumaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Walker v. City of BirminghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- United States v. Ben J. Slutsky and Julius S. Slutsky D/B/A "The Nevele,"Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- Robert D. Kortness v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1975
- United States v. Anthony Salerno Appeal of William SilvermanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
- Samuel K. Garafola v. Charles L. Benson, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1974
- Frank Grasso, Appellee-Petitioner v. John J. Norton, Warden, Federal Correctional Institution, Danbury, Connecticut, Appellants-RespondentsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.