Gomez v. Rangen's Inc.

It will not surprise the trial bar that the author of today’s majority opinion was the sole lamenting dissenter in Sines v. Appel, 103 Idaho 9, 644 P.2d 331 (1982), but the bar may well be startled to see three other members so readily joining the opinion. It may neither surprise nor startle anyone that the majority are unmindful of our recent Houser case1 where this same Supreme Court experienced no trouble in simply assuming that the same Commission properly applied a statute where the record was absolutely devoid of any indication that it had been considered — which was painstakingly…