Hayes v. Wells
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Caroline County. Tlie facts of the ease, together with the exceptions which were taken in the Court below by the defendant, are sufficiently stated in the opinion of this Court. The verdict and judgment being for the plaintiffs, the defendant appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtMaulsby, J.
Two questions are presented in this case, one on the admissibility of evidence, and the other on the prayer of the appellant refused by the Circuit Court. We will consider the prayer first.
The appellant assigned to the appellees the bond of Alexander A. Laws and Daker G. Jester, due February 7th, 1857, by an assignment in writing under seal, containing a guaranty for the payment thereof, and on this guaranty the suit was brought.
Laws, one of the obligors in the assigned bond, had two bonds of Theodore L. Davis, one of which was due in December, 1857, and the other in September, 1858, on both…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Higgins v. CarltonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1868
- Oberndorff v. Union BankCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1869
- United States v. HowellU.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey · 1826
- Tate v. WymondIndiana Supreme Court · 1844
- Chew v. BeallCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1859
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. State ex rel. ChambersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1895
- Belleville Savings Bank v. BornmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1888
- Gott v. State ex rel. BarnardCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1876
- A/C Electric Co. v. Aetna InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1968
- Asbell v. Marshall Building & Loan Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1928
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.