Legal Opinion

McClay v. Williamson

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided January 12, 1928No. Gen. No. 7,760PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Boggs

On February 25, 1921, plaintiff in error filed a bill in the circuit court of Lake county against defendants in error, to foreclose a mechanic’s lien. Defendants in error answered said bill and subsequently filed a cross-bill, to which plaintiff in error filed an answer. On October 11, 1921, said cause was referred to William A. Deane as special master to take and report the evidence with his conclusions.

On October 6, 1926, on the general call of the chancery docket, the court dismissed said cause for want of prosecution. Thereafter, at the December term, plaintiff in error entered a motion…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Leonard v. GarlandIllinois Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Delano v. BennettIllinois Supreme Court · 1871
  3. Tyson v. . RobinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1843
  4. Weil v. MulvaneyIllinois Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Willey v. DurginMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1875

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bejda v. SGL Industries, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1979
  2. Van Tieghem v. SushenkaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1929
  3. Maniatis v. CarelinAppellate Court of Illinois · 1936
  4. Sander v. Dow Chemical Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1993
  5. Bejda v. SGL Industries, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API