Legal Opinion

Moore v. Hinson

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided May 29, 1917No. 9691PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Before Mauedin, J., Cheraw, Action by D. F. Moore against G. W. Hinson. From judgment for defendant, plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Chief Justice Gary.

When this case was called for argument, the respondent’s attorney announced that his information was by a telegram from his office at Cheraw that the case was settled. Appellant’s attorney said he had no information concerning the alleged settlement, and argued the case. Investigation develops the fact that the case was settled between the par ties, money paid to the clerk of Court of Chesterfield county by the respondent, and received by the appellant.

It is, therefore, ordered that this action on the part of the appellant worked…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Berry v. ZAHLER ET UX.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1951
  2. South Carolina State Highway Department v. McKeown Food Store No. 9Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API