Legal Opinion

Kilday v. State ex rel. Candler

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided September 25, 1934No. 9641PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BICKETT, Chief Justice.

This proceeding is in the nature of a quo warranto action, brought under article 3173, Revised Civil Statutes of Texas (1925), to prevent the name of James V. Allred, the nominee of the Democratic Party in Texas for the office of Governor, from being placed on the official ballot for the general election to be held November 6, 1934.

The petition was filed on September 14, 1934, in the district court of the Ninety-Fourth judicial district in the name of the state of Texas, acting by Walter Tynan, the district attorney of Bexar county, upon the relation of Ralph Candler,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Love v. WilcoxTexas Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Staples v. State Ex Rel. KingTexas Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Dickson v. StricklandTexas Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Sterling v. FergusonTexas Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Ferguson v. MaddoxTexas Supreme Court · 1924

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. MustoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1982
  2. Ex Parte LeforsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1961
  3. American Liberty Pipe Line Co. v. AgeyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1942
  4. In Re Steve SmithTexas Supreme Court · 2025
  5. Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion, Texas Attorney General Reports1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API