Scheckter v. Rubin

Smith, P. J.,

— This matter comes before the court on a rule to show cause why interest should not be paid to Clara 0. Rubin upon funds advanced by her to Associate Tax Consultants subsequent to the appointment of Charles S. Rockey, receiver of the said company, but prior to the date he undertook his duties as receiver.

The said sums of money advanced by petitioner to pay the salaries of the employes of Associate Tax Consultants on the following dates and in the following amounts, are as follows:

May 31, 1941.................. $635.00

June 7,1941 .................. 660.00

June 13,1941…