Abramovitz v. City of New York
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Timely service of a notice of claim is a condition precedent to the commencement of an action sounding in tort against the New York City Transit Authority (hereinafter the NYCTA) (see General Municipal Law §§ 50-e [1] [a]; 50-i [1] [a]; Public Authorities Law § 1212 [2]; Matter of Groves v New York City Tr. Auth., 44 AD3d 856 [2007]; Small v New York City Tr. Auth., 14 AD3d 690, 691 [2005]; Adams v New York City Tr. Auth., 140 AD2d 572, 573 [1988]). In determining whether to extend the time to serve a notice of claim, the court will consider whether, in particular, the public corporation…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Iacone v. Town of HempsteadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Small v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Khalid v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Groves v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Narcisse v. Incorporated Village of Central IslipAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Klass v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Kuterman v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Hunte v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Luna v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- Andrews v. Long Island RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.