Jackson v. State

OPINION

HOLMAN, Justice.

Appeal is taken from conviction of burglary of a building and repetition. The punishment assessed by the jury is ninety-nine years imprisonment.

We affirm.

Appellant complains that the evidence is insufficient to sustain the conviction because the State failed to produce sufficient evidence that appellant acted with intent to promote or assist the commission of the offense by soliciting, encouraging, directing, aiding, or attempting to aid another person commit the offense.

Where the sufficiency of the evidence is challenged on appeal, the reviewing court should view the…