United States v. Holmes
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING
2Per curiam
In a petition for rehearing the government has called to the court’s attention the fact that Congress deleted from the proposed amendments to the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure which were referred to it by the Supreme Court of the United States the provision for the production in criminal cases of the names and addresses of witnesses upon request. [Fed.R.Crim.P. 16(a)(1), (e)]. See Pub.L. 94-64 (1975). The government cites this action as being a conclusive determination “that Congress has formulated a national policy against the disclosure of witnesses’ names and…
3Cases cited2 opinions
- Davis v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1974
- Brian v. California Welfare Rights OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
4Cited by7 opinions
- Day v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
- Harling v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
- Hilliard v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
- United States v. JonesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1981
- United States v. BaconDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1981
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.