Legal Opinion

Lively v. Federal Land Bank of Louisville

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided December 8, 1943PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Ratliff

Affirming.

On May 10, 1937, the appellant, Oscar L. Lively, and appellee, the Federal Land Bank of Louisville, Kentucky, entered into a written agreement, in which Lively was called the “offeror,” by the terms of which Lively agreed to purchase from the bank, upon its acceptance of Lively’s offer, 130 acres of land situated in Daviess county, Kentucky, for the sum of $2,750, $600 of said amount to be paid in cash upon delivery of the deed and the balance of the purchase price, $2,150, evidenced by Lively’s note payable in 33 annual installments beginning…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Federal Land. Bank of N.O. v. CooperMississippi Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Stanley v. SloneCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1926
  3. Riner v. CatronCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Shinn v. BuxtonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1946
  2. Gallin v. CombsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1960
  3. Glasel v. Jones, Circuit Court of the 19th Judicial Circuit of Florida, Okeechobee County1971
  4. Shinn v. BuxtonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1946
  5. Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion, Texas Attorney General Reports1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API