Legal Opinion

Healey v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 19, 1985No. 84-796PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

The final judgment of conviction and sentence under review is affirmed save in one respect, namely, the said judgment and sentence must be modified to conform to the jury verdict returned below. The cause is therefore remanded to the trial court with directions to modify the final judgment of conviction and sentence to reflect that the defendant stands convicted of unarmed robbery as found by the jury. The defendant need not be present when the trial court makes this modification. Green v. State, 446 So.2d 253 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984); Sandstrom v. State, 390 So.2d 448, 449 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980),…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hall v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1939
  2. O'CALLAGHAN v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1983
  3. Koontz v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1967
  4. Sandstrom v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
  5. Green v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Farinas v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
  2. Fuller v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API