Legal Opinion

Crockett v. New York City Housing Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 7, 1993PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Alfred Toker, J.), entered June 12, 1992, which denied defendant’s motion for summary judgment, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

On a motion for summary judgment, the moving party has the initial burden of establishing its entitlement to judgment as a matter of law (Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557, 562). While defendant urges that the assailants in this case could have been guests of a tenant, or could have gained access to the building other than through the unlocked front doors, there is no proof to support such speculation. Plaintiff…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Zuckerman v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Russo v. Grace InstituteNew York Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Russo v. Grace InstituteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Burgos v. Aqueduct Realty Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  2. Targovnik v. 460 West 34th Street AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API