Gault v. State

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

The indictment charged that the appellant “did then and there'unlawfully and knowingly keep, and was then and there interested in keeping, certain premises, a building, room and place,” * * * to be used for the purpose of manufacturing intoxicating liquor. Punishment fixed at confinement in the penitentiary for a period of one year. .

The sufficiency of the indictment is challenged upon the ground that it is indefinite in failing to advise whether it was intended to prove that the premises kept was a building, room or other kind of place. The indictment used the…