Rapp v. NaphCare Inc

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA 9 10 JOHN RAPP et al., CASE NO. 3:21-cv-05800-DGE 11 Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING MOTION 12 v. FOR SANCTIONS (DKT. NO. 91) 13 NAPHCARE, INC. et al., 14 Defendants. 15 16 I INTRODUCTION 17 This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiffs’ motion for sanctions pursuant to 18 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37(e). (Dkt. No. 91.) After reviewing the parties’ briefing and 19 the remainder of the record, the Court GRANTS Plaintiffs’ motion and ENTERS DEFAULT 20 JUDGMENT against Defendant Kitsap County. 21 II…