Legal Opinion
In Re Royal Ahold N v. Securities & Erisa Litigation
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided November 2, 2006No. Civil 03-MD-1539PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
BLAKE, District Judge.
On June 16, 2006, following a hearing, lead plaintiffs’ motion for final approval of class certification, settlement, and plan of allocation was granted. All objections as to those issues were denied. 1 Lead plaintiffs’ motion for approval of lead counsel’s application for attorneys’ fees, and the objections directed only to fees, were reserved for further consideration.
As reflected in the June 16, 2006 Order, lead plaintiffs obtained a $1.1 billion cash settlement in their securities fraud suit against Royal Ahold (“Ahold”) and related defendants. 2 They seek…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Visa U.S.A. Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
- In Re: Cendant Corporation LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
- In Re: Cendant Corporation Prides LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
- In Re WorldCom, Inc. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005
- In Re Royal Ahold N v. Securities & Erisa LitigationDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2004
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- In Re Diet DrugsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
- In Re Cardinal Health Inc. Securities LitigationsDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2007
- In Re Enron Corp. SecuritiesDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2008
- In Re Initial Public Offering Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2009
- In re Heartland Payment Systems, Inc. Customer Data Security Breach LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2012
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.