Legal Opinion

McDonald v. . Carson

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 5, 1886PublishedCited by 14 opinions

PETITION by the defendants to rehear, filed at October Term, 1886, of the Supreme Court. The case is reported in the 94th volume, at page 498.

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, C. J.

This case was, after an elaborate and exhaustive argument, oral and by brief, at the last Term, carefully considered, and all the numerous errors assigned, examined and determined adversely to the appellants. The petition to rehear, points out three alleged errors, the subjects of which have been fully reargued at the present term, and we are now called on to revise those rulings, and pass upon their correctness.

I. The first assigned error is specified in these words: “ The Court says: The defendant’s first exception is to the action of the Court in preparing the issue numbered two. In this…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Kidder v. . McIlhennySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1879
  2. Allen v. . BakerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1882
  3. Lawton v. . GilesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1884
  4. Simmons v. . MannSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1885
  5. Burton v. Wilmington & Weldon RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1881

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Shaffer v. GaynorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
  2. Piedmont Wagon Co. v. ByrdSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
  3. Maxwell v. . McIverSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1893
  4. Byrd v. Carolina Spruce Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
  5. Shaffer v. . GaynorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API