Legal Opinion

Charley v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 20, 1991No. 90-3524PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ERVIN, Judge.

Appellant, David Earl Charley, raises five issues involving this criminal appeal from his convictions and sentences for one count of carrying a concealed firearm and eight counts of petit theft. We agree with appellant that the trial court erred in denying his motion for judgment of acquittal on the charge of carrying a concealed firearm, because the state failed to provide competent, substantial evidence that the starter pistol found in appellant’s pocket was a “firearm” as defined in Section 790.001(6), Florida Statutes (1989), and. therefore reverse on that point. We affirm…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. M.R.R. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  2. M. M. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
  3. Ridley v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
  4. Harpham v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. Glenn Ruel BurnettCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
  2. Evans v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
  3. Ruben B. Casais v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
  4. Thayer v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API