Legal Opinion

Russell v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided November 29, 1982No. F-81-339PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BUSSEY, Judge:

The events from which this case arose occurred in Tahlequah, Oklahoma, in May of 1978. On the evening of May 22, 1978, an undercover agent with the Federal Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms, Loyd Cobb, and an informant, Robert “Chunky” McFarlin, contacted Grover Stanley Monholland for the supposed purpose of obtaining Monholland’s help in locating a pickup for Agent Cobb to purchase. During the course of their conversations, Agent Cobb led Monholland to believe that he, Cobb, was an explosives expert in dire need of money. Monholland subsequently informed Agent Cobb…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Greene v. MasseySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Bartkus v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1959

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hale v. GibsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
  2. Harjo v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1990
  3. State v. DavisCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1991
  4. Hackney v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1994
  5. Holt v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1989

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API