Leonard v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas
Appeal from, the District Court of Tarrant. Tried below before the Hon. A. J. Hood. The gravamen of the indictment is set out in the opinion originally rendered in this well-contested and instructive case; and in that and the opinion delivered on the motion for a rehearing the leading facts underlying the rulings are indicated. The most material of the testimony, however, may be useful.
Read the full summary
Appeal from, the District Court of Tarrant. Tried below before the Hon. A. J. Hood. The gravamen of the indictment is set out in the opinion originally rendered in this well-contested and instructive case; and in that and the opinion delivered on the motion for a rehearing the leading facts underlying the rulings are indicated. The most material of the testimony, however, may be useful. M. B. Loyd, for the State, testified that ever since the organization of the First National Bank of Fort Worth, as authorized by virtue of the certificate of the United States comptroller of the currency,…
1Opinion of the CourtWinkler, J.
This appeal is from a verdict and judgment of conviction on a charge of embezzlement of twenty bales of cotton alleged to belong to the First National Bank of Fort Worth, which, the indictment avers, were placed in the possession of the appellant as bailee, the appellant being the keeper of a cotton-yard in the city of Fort Worth, Tarrant County.
The principal grounds relied on for reversal of the judgment are : first, the insufficiency of the indictment; second, alleged error in admitting testimony against the defendant on the trial below, over his objections, and to the admission *434of which…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Ex parte HedleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
- Lessee of Washington Sockman v. SockmanOhio Supreme Court · 1849
- Belverman v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1856
- Henderson v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1854
- Perry v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1876
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.