Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Ramos

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 14, 2011No. 2207 EDA 2010PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

COLVILLE, J.:

This is a pro se appeal from the order dismissing Appellant’s pro se petition filed pursuant to the Post Conviction Relief Act (“PCRA”). We vacate and remand.

Appellant’s PCRA petition is based on a conviction for which he was sentenced on June 17,1987, to a one-year term of probation. The instant PCRA petition, filed on September 4, 2009, is Appellant’s first. Citing 42 Pa.C.S.A. § 9543(a), the PCRA court dismissed the petition on the basis that Appellant was ineligible for PCRA relief because he was not currently serving this sentence, awaiting execution on this crime…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. GuthrieSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  2. Commonwealth v. StoutSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. KelseySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  2. Com. v. Caldwell, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  3. Com. v. Clark, L.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
  4. Com. v. Dale, L.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  5. Com. v. Delp, R.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API