Legal Opinion

Horan v. Roan

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 5, 2011No. B216190PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ALDRICH, J.

INTRODUCTION

Nearly two years after the probate court approved their settlement of a will contest and dismissed with prejudice their petitions claiming that approximately $136,000 was part of the decedent’s estate, respondents Robert Douglas Roan and Janet True objected to the co-administrators’ accounting for failure to include that $136,000 in the estate’s residue. Co-administrator Nancy Horan appeals from the trial court’s judgment ordering her to return the $136,000 to the estate. We conclude that respondents are barred by the doctrine of res judicata from relitigating…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Mycogen Corp. v. Monsanto Co.California Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Torrey Pines Bank v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
  3. Estate of Lucas v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Alpha Mechanical, Heating & Air Conditioning, Inc. v. Travelers Casualty & Surety Co. of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
  5. Kester v. McNearCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Jsj Limited Partnership v. MehrbanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  2. Federal Home Loan Bank v. Countrywide Financial Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2013
  3. Legendary Investors Group No. 1, LLC v. NiemannCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  4. Tammy Livingston v. Jay Livingston Music, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2025
  5. Villa v. HellerDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2012

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API